Deep Freeze, Deep Issues

An article earlier this week from NBC News kicked off a storm of coverage of egg freezing. You know something is having a cultural moment when The Onion satirizes it (twice).

As the initial article pointed out, Facebook and Apple, as part of their employee benefit packages, are now offering (or soon will be offering) to pay for female employees to freeze their eggs. “The firms appear to be the first major employers to offer this coverage for non-medical reasons.”

In June of this year, Jennifer—who has been writing on egg freezing since at least 2007—wrote a piece on egg freezing for The Public Discourse. In “Egg Freezing: Beating Biology and Buying Time, But at What Cost?” she pointed out, “Egg freezing does not really beat biology. It buys a small chance at giving birth, but at a very high price indeed.”

money_150x185In August, our Chris White commented here on our website on “a new low in the exploitation of women: egg-freezing parties.” In “Egg Freezing’s False Promises,” he reminded us that it’s always important to follow the money: “it’s hard not to think that the real celebration was taking place behind the scenes by those in the fertility industry that were about to cash in on the promise of children that they know they can never ensure.”

Follow the money indeed. Facebook. Apple. That’s big money. Other companies will follow their lead.

But as Jennifer and Chris have already pointed out, money will not address all of the costs. There are deeper issues at stake.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Alive Inside

Over the weekend I attended a screening of the documentary Alive Inside, which won the Audience Award at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival. It’s easy to see why it won the award—it is a very well made documentary that engages viewers in a range of emotions.

The film raises a number of points related to the field of bioethics, particularly as it regards end-of-life issues. For example, the film displays a deep affection for the elderly as well as an appreciation for the wisdom and experience that comes with age. The film points out ways in which many cultures revere their elders, who maintain prominent places within families and within households.

Although it is not the point of the film, in this we do see an alternative to those cultural voices that seek to eliminate suffering by eliminating the sufferer. Instead, we see care and concern, affection and appreciation.

The film also contains images that portray the kinds of scenes many rightly fear. For example, a person left slumped in a wheelchair, alone in a hallway. Such images come in a section of the film that raises pointed questions about whether the ways in which we are currently caring for older adults is truly meeting their needs.

Beyond this, two things really struck me in watching the film. First was the depth of care that people working in nursing homes have for those in their charge. We meet several people who clearly go out of their way—well above and beyond what we might expect—in order to provide for and care for those they are employed to serve.

Secondly, the film is a quiet endorsement of the effect one person can have, when he or she works with diligence and tenacity to make a difference in the lives of others. Social worker Dan Cohen discovered something simple that makes a difference in the lives of others, and he has worked tirelessly to rally others to the cause of improving the lives of older adults, particularly those who are experiencing dementia and other age-related challenges. Now the organization he founded has reached “hundreds of facilities throughout the U.S. and Canada.”

In all of this I’ve not even touched on the central element of the film, which is the power of music to engage listeners and transport them to another place and time. I don’t want to give too much away, because the experience of watching the film is so enjoyable.

So see the film if and when you can. It is currently screening in selected cities, and it will soon be available online.

UPDATE: Alive Inside is now available on Netflix and Amazon.

In the mean time, here is the trailer:

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

More New York Times Coverage of Surrogacy, Breeders?

The New York Times today published the third and final installment in a series of articles on surrogacy. This article appears on the front page and is titled, “Surrogates and Couples Face a Maze of Laws, State by State.”

Weighing the Risks

One of the strongest opponents of surrogacy is Jennifer Lahl, president of the Center for Bioethics and Culture in California, who testified for the Kansas legislation and lobbied Gov. Bobby Jindal to veto the Louisiana bill.

She sees the practice as rife with risk: Informed consent, she said, is not really possible in a relatively new field. So little is known about the risks of the hormonal stimulation undergone by egg donors and surrogates, she added. In addition, the emerging field of epigenetics is yielding new discoveries about how conditions in the womb affect a child’s later development.

“This is part of the American entrepreneurial approach,” Ms. Lahl said. “We design things, put them out there, they can be dangerous, and then have to ratchet them back to add safety limits. I see assisted reproductive technology, which is relatively new, as a space where we’re starting to see the harms.”

Ms. Lahl’s new film, “Breeders: A Subclass of Women?” features four women who served as surrogates describing wrenching experiences. One is Gail Robinson, a Texas woman who agreed to carry a baby for her brother and his partner. In the course of the pregnancy, she had a serious falling-out with her brother and suffered life-threatening eclampsia. Ms. Robinson, who had never had a child of her own, ended up seeking custody of the twin girls she carried and was declared a legal parent, along with the partner, despite her lack of genetic connection to the twins.

A quote from our Breeders: A Subclass of Women?, which was featured in the first article in the series, “Coming to U.S. for Baby, and Womb to Carry It: Foreign Couples Heading to America for Surrogate Pregnancies,” was the New York Times quotation of the day:

“I was crying. I said he has to come in; he’s the father; he should be here. He came in, he cut the cord. He took the baby. And that’s the last I ever heard from them.”

HEATHER RICE, a surrogate who carried a child with a defect, describing giving birth over the biological parents’ objections. From breeders.cbc-network.org

The second article in the series looked at surrogacy as an aspect of surrogacy tourism: “A Surrogacy Agency That Delivered Heartache.”

We are grateful that our work is getting such a prominent hearing. This wouldn not be possible witout our faithful supporters. Thank you.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Kajsa Ekis Ekman at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas

An important talk on surrogacy from Australia’s “Festival of Dangerous Ideas.” Jennifer Lahl interviewed the speaker, Kajsa Ekis Ekman, in July, and that interview is posted here.

Posted in Blog | Tagged | Leave a comment

Surrogates Speaking Up and Speaking Out

Our Christopher White has “Hot Topic” item on surrogacy on the Human Life Review blog. In it, he highlights the far-reaching effects of the practice.

Surrogacy never concerns just one person’s decision-making capacity. In addition to the women involved, the process also affects the children conceived through this method, and a host of other individuals. As one of the surrogate mothers in Breeders recalls, those most disturbed by her decision to be a surrogate were her own children, who couldn’t understand how their pregnant mother could intend to give away the child she was carrying. “Might, on some future occasion,” these youngsters wondered, “we be given away, too?”

It’s well worth your time to read it all.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , | Leave a comment

This Deserves to be Read Far and Wide

Australian feminist health researcher Dr. Renate Klein has written a timely and important article on surrogacy, particularly in the wake of the scandal surrounding the Baby Gammy case. Specifically, she is responding to those who claim that regulation will cure all that is wrong with surrogacy.

Her view differs considerably:

As a critic of the IVF industry for three decades, my solution is very different. Rather than regulating a system that commodifies the resulting child and invariably uses women as “containers” for carrying and birthing a baby they are taught to say is not theirs, we need to focus on the demand for surrogacy and try to reduce it.

In her research she has found that

The right to a child is not questioned, the fact that the birth mother might regret giving away her child for the rest of her life, or decide to keep the baby, is only discussed in the context of what precautions intended parents need to take so that this does not happen. It is accepted without discussion that a “gestational surrogate” – the term used for a woman who becomes pregnant with an implanted embryo that does not contain her own genes – will not have a relationship with the developing baby as it is “not her child”. An absurd notion for any woman who has ever been pregnant.

She boldly concludes,

Surrogacy is a heartless, exploitative, capitalist enterprise. There is no right to a child; children are not commodities, and surrogates are not just “suitcases” or “angels”…

Read the whole thing.

And then pass it on — share it, tweet it, print it out and mail it to everyone you know, whatever works for you.

Spread. The. Word.

#WomenAreNOTBreeders
#ChildrenAreNOTCommodities
#StopSurrogacyNow

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

BIG News: Eggsploitation Digital

We are very pleased to announce that our award-winning documentary Eggsploitation is now available for rental or purchase on iTunes, Amazon Instant Video, Google Play, and Xbox Video.

This is the updated and expanded version with new interviews and footage that we released last year.

Action Items:

  1. Rent or purchase Eggsploitation on your favorite platform/service. If you haven’t seen the film, now is the time. If you’ve seen it already, see it again!
  2. Rate Eggsploitation on your favorite platform/service. Ratings encourage others to watch the film.
  3. Rave about Eggsploitation. Spread the word! Encourage others to rent/purchase and rate Eggsploitation on iTunes, Amazon Instant Video, Google Play, or Xbox Video. Email, Tweet, Facebook, g+, Pinterest, Tumblr, Instagram, Semaphore, etc., etc., to as many people as possible.

PS: Seriously, please help us spread the word! Email, Tweet, Facebook, g+, Pinterest, Tumblr, Instagram, Semaphore, etc., etc., to as many people as possible.

Posted in Blog | Tagged | Leave a comment

Breeders? in the New York Times

Over the weekend, the New York Times ran the first article in what we understand will be a series of articles on surrogacy.

The article is entitled “Coming to U.S. for Baby, and Womb to Carry It: Foreign Couples Heading to America for Surrogate Pregnancies,” and is available on the NYT website.

Heather, who is featured in our Breeders: A Subclass of Women? is interviewed in the article, and a quote from her, from Breeders?, was yesterday’s New York Times Quotation of The Day.

I was crying. I said he has to come in; he’s the father; he should be here. He came in, he cut the cord. He took the baby. And that’s the last I ever heard from them.

HEATHER RICE, a surrogate who carried a child with a defect, describing giving birth over the biological parents’ objections. From breeders.cbc-network.org

The reporter writing the series has interviewed Jennifer extensively. As the rest of the articles in the series are released, we will be sure to post them here, on facebook, and on twitter…so watch these spaces!

If you haven’t seen Breeders? yet, you can watch it online at Vimeo, order the DVD here, or attend next month’s screening in Minneapolis.

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Press Coverage of Breeders?

breeders ny post coverageWe’re grateful for all of the press coverage Breeders: A Subclass of Women? has garnered. We’ve now gathered everything so far in one place.

Outlets include ABC News, New York Post, Women’s Health, Sidney Morning Herald, Pop Sugar, On Faith, Daily Mail, Human Life Review, National Catholic Register, National Review Online, and more.

We’ll keep it updated as new stories roll in, so take a look (and stay tuned for more)!

http://breeders.cbc-network.org/?page_id=409

Posted in Blog | Tagged | Leave a comment

On Surrogacy, “Breeders?”, and TPR

Two new pieces on surrogacy, Breeders: A Subclass of Women?, and third-party reproduction have hit the internet this morning.

First is a profile piece at ABC News, which is drawing a lot of comments on ABC’s website as well as some, well, less than civil discourse on twitter.

Woman Sets Out to Ban Surrogacy

Both supporters and critics of surrogacy agreements agree there are a patchwork of inconsistent laws around the country that loosely regulate the growing surrogacy industry.

 

Second is an article Jennifer just wrote entitled “Is Surrogate Pregnancy Another Form of Human Trafficking?” In it she discusses the current landscape regarding surrogacy and the wider area of third-party reproduction.

Is Surrogate Pregnancy Another Form of Human Trafficking?

Touching stories of infertile couples are blinding us to the devastating human consequences of some fertility technologies.

Both are well worth your time. And, if you’re so inclined, wade into and weigh in on the comment section of the articles.

 

Posted in Blog | Tagged , , | Leave a comment